CASE STUDIES
A short list. Detailed where the client allows; anonymized where they don't. Each entry includes the constraint, the approach, and what shipped.
[Two to three sentences. The constraint we walked into. The architecture we proposed. The measured outcome — p99 latency, throughput, cost-per-request, or whichever metric the client measured against.]
[Two to three sentences. The cost trajectory before our engagement. The Spot + Karpenter changes we shipped. The measurable savings, with throughput unchanged.]
[Two to three sentences. What the prototype did. What was missing for production — evals, observability, prompt versioning. What we shipped and how the client's team owns it now.]
[Two to three sentences. The scope of the review. What we read, what we tested, who we talked to. The findings memo and what the investment committee decided.]
[Two to three sentences. The pipeline we reviewed. The five highest-risk findings and the remediation plan we proposed. Status of remediation at the time of writing.]
[Two to three sentences. The team's constraints — small headcount, fast launch. The architecture we proposed. What's running in production today and the team's velocity since.]